Said a few people that are upset because an Air Force officer has been charged with mouthing off about Trump.
Some have said that the UCMJ needs to be looked into.
It doesn't.
Anyone that has served under it and has taken time to figure it out realizes that although there are strict rules under it there are protections afforded a serviceman that are not offered in civilian life.
An example of which is misappropriation of government property. In civilian life it's a felony as such. A civilian convicted is going to at the least face a felony conviction record.
On the other hand, for example, a GI that swipes a piece of equipment to replace one that is missing and gets caught can be punished under Article 15, get a limited punishment and no criminal record.
If the accused wants to he can refuse the Article 15 and demand a trial by courts-martial and risk a federal conviction.
The UCMJ has served the military well since it took effect in 1951. It relaced the Rules of War and articles for Governance of the Navy. Both of these were cans of worms that provided few rights for the serviceperson that served under them.
To find out why the blog is pink just cut and paste this:
http://piccoloshash.blogspot.com/2009/12/my-feminine-side-blog-stays-pink.html NO ANIMALS WERE HARMED IN THE WRITING OF TODAY'S ESSAY